<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Aaron Fisher</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The uniqueness of SHAP depends on how you handle external information</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/SHAP-Symmetry.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A few months ago I was rereading the SHAP NeurIPS paper and noticed error in Thm 1. Roughly, L&amp;amp;L Thm 1 says that the SHAP solution is unique, even if we allow prior or external information to influence the model explanation. That's actually not true...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2020-09-01:/SHAP-Symmetry.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>transparency</category><category>interpretability</category><category>explainability</category></item><item><title>Why divide by n-1? Understanding the sample variance with pairwise differences</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/why-divide-n-1-pairwise-differences.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why divide by n-1 for the sample variance? Because the variance tells us how much people tend to be different &lt;em&gt;from each other&lt;/em&gt;. And, for each person in our sample, there are only n-1 people we can compare them to. This is not just a heuristic...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2018-11-10:/why-divide-n-1-pairwise-differences.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>combinations</category><category>education</category></item><item><title>Why statistics professors should grade for craftsmanship</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/grade-for-craft.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The statistical community values skillful explanations in almost every setting except the classroom. Students are typically graded for correctness, completeness, and (sometimes) participation, but not for craftsmanship. That's a missed opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2016-09-03:/grade-for-craft.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>communication</category><category>language</category><category>best practices</category><category>education</category></item><item><title>Mark Twain was a stats fan, anything else is a Damn Lie.</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/mark-twain-was-a-stats-fan.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many of us have heard the quote popularized by Mark Twain, that there are "lies, damned lies, and statistics." It turns out though that Twain's comment was not meant as an attack on overly complicated statistical wizardry that obfuscates the truth. If you read the quote in context, his point is actually quite the opposite...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2015-07-26:/mark-twain-was-a-stats-fan.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>communication</category><category>variable adjustment</category></item><item><title>Many statistical "gold standards" aren't perfect, but that's why they're perfectly named</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/gold-standards-are-not-perfect.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Statisticians and computer scientists often use the term "gold standard" for the best possible benchmark you could have when trying to estimate something. I often hear statisticians questioning the benchmark though, saying that "it's not really a gold standard" because it isn't perfect. My response  is that the term "gold standard" should still apply. Moreso even, because the actual gold standard of matching currency to gold reserves isn't perfect either...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2015-07-23:/gold-standards-are-not-perfect.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>language</category><category>benchmarks</category><category>best practices</category></item><item><title>4 minutes to run code: a live demo inside a JSM speed talk</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/JSM-2014-demo-part1.html</link><description>&lt;!-- &lt;img src="blog_supplements/2014-07-28_JSM-2014-demo-part1/faces_results_crop_PCs_preview.png" alt="faces_ex" style="width: 33%; float: right;"/&gt; --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Monday morning, at this year's &lt;a href="http://www.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2014/index.cfm#" target="_blank"&gt;JSM&lt;/a&gt;, I'll be presenting at the &lt;a href="http://www.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2014/onlineprogram/ActivityDetails.cfm?SessionID=210515" target="_blank"&gt;speed talks session on Epidemiology and Imaging&lt;/a&gt;. My plan is to attempt something a little unconventional: to live demo a new method for a computationally intensive procedure (&lt;a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0922" target="_blank"&gt;bootstrap PCA&lt;/a&gt;), within a presentation that's limited to just 4 minutes...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2014-07-31:/JSM-2014-demo-part1.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>computing</category><category>talks</category><category>bootstrap</category></item><item><title>ggBrain - An R package for beautiful brain figures</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/ggBrain-debut.html</link><description>&lt;!-- &lt;img src="blog_supplements/2014-07-24_ggBrain-debut/2014-07-30_RAVENS_PCA_saggital_fitted_preview.png" alt="bootPCAimg" style="width: 40%; float: right;"/&gt;&lt;/br&gt; --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out this lovely brain image figure! I wrote &lt;a href="https://github.com/aaronjfisher/ggBrain" target="_blank"&gt;an R package called ggBrain&lt;/a&gt; that lets you generate figures like these with just a couple lines of code!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2014-07-30:/ggBrain-debut.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>plots</category><category>brain imaging</category></item><item><title>Mission Statement for the Blog</title><link>https://aaronjfisher.github.io/mission-statement.html</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In this blog, I'll talk about issues in statistics from a graduate student's perspective. Some specific topics include: surviving a PhD, enjoying a PhD, designing intuitive graphics, and dealing with high dimensional data. There will also be musings from time to time about food/cooking (i.e. JHSPH Biostat Chili Cookoff strategy), and culture in general...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:aaronjfisher.github.io,2014-04-07:/mission-statement.html</guid><category>blog</category><category>blog</category></item></channel></rss>